<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Man-made Structures Seen from Space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/man-made-structures-seen-from-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/man-made-structures-seen-from-space/</link>
	<description>When in Doubt, Try it Out!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:19:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/man-made-structures-seen-from-space/comment-page-1/#comment-32467</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 04:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smarterthanthat.com/?p=801#comment-32467</guid>
		<description>wow what a great read. I can&#039;t believe we can see that from space....I would love to go into space one day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow what a great read. I can&#8217;t believe we can see that from space&#8230;.I would love to go into space one day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mooeypoo</title>
		<link>http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/man-made-structures-seen-from-space/comment-page-1/#comment-25809</link>
		<dc:creator>mooeypoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smarterthanthat.com/?p=801#comment-25809</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-25713&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@ASFalcon13&lt;/a&gt;, EXACTLY!!! And we can see quite a lot of detail from google map, and yet, still, people wonder whether or not items are visible from space. ha! :)

To be fair, though, the lower-latitude images from google maps are largely from planes and not from satellites, but still, even the low-orbit satellites (around 300km or so) show us quite a lot of detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-25713" rel="nofollow">@ASFalcon13</a>, EXACTLY!!! And we can see quite a lot of detail from google map, and yet, still, people wonder whether or not items are visible from space. ha! <img src='http://www.smarterthanthat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>To be fair, though, the lower-latitude images from google maps are largely from planes and not from satellites, but still, even the low-orbit satellites (around 300km or so) show us quite a lot of detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASFalcon13</title>
		<link>http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/man-made-structures-seen-from-space/comment-page-1/#comment-25713</link>
		<dc:creator>ASFalcon13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smarterthanthat.com/?p=801#comment-25713</guid>
		<description>Of course we can see man-made objects from space.  If we couldn&#039;t, why would the government invest so much money in spy satellites?

Of course, if you&#039;d like further proof, there&#039;s a website called Google Maps that features a combination of aerial and satellite imagery of all kinds of man-made objects ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we can see man-made objects from space.  If we couldn&#8217;t, why would the government invest so much money in spy satellites?</p>
<p>Of course, if you&#8217;d like further proof, there&#8217;s a website called Google Maps that features a combination of aerial and satellite imagery of all kinds of man-made objects <img src='http://www.smarterthanthat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Hearn</title>
		<link>http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/man-made-structures-seen-from-space/comment-page-1/#comment-25591</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Hearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smarterthanthat.com/?p=801#comment-25591</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also the question of what do you mean when you say &quot;see&quot;? See with your naked eyes? Whose naked eyes, human vision varies a lot. See with a camera? The photo of the pyramids is given as &quot;proof&quot; that the pyramids are visible from space, but what kind of lens was used? A telephoto? We&#039;ve had cameras in space for decades that can see much smaller objects than the pyramids. My house isn&#039;t the size of the pyramids, but it&#039;s clearly visible on satellite photos. So is it visible from space? I doubt even the sharpest pair of eyes could make it out from space, even for low definitions of &quot;space&quot;. 

And how about defining &quot;man made object&quot;? Is the Panama Canal a man made object? I&#039;m pretty sure it&#039;s visible from space (for most definitions of &quot;visible&quot; and &quot;space&quot;). I think most would agree that the Hoover Dam is a man made object, but what of Lake Mead? Is a lake created by man a &quot;man made object&quot;? Hmmm, I think it&#039;s probably not an &quot;object&quot;, but I&#039;m sure there are those that might disagree (on the Internet, someone will always disagree). Pick any of thousands of malls or airports, all of which are larger than the pyramids. 

Basically, the whole question is ill-defined.  But for further analysis, see the &quot;Visibilty from space&quot; section of the Wikipedia article on the Great Wall of China at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Wall_of_China#Visibility_from_space . Based on that (with the usual caveats about trusting what one reads on Wikipedia), the Great Wall is just barely, maybe, almost visible from LEO. If you know exactly where to look. And if the weather is really good and the light is right. And if you have good eyes. And maybe a good imagination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also the question of what do you mean when you say &#8220;see&#8221;? See with your naked eyes? Whose naked eyes, human vision varies a lot. See with a camera? The photo of the pyramids is given as &#8220;proof&#8221; that the pyramids are visible from space, but what kind of lens was used? A telephoto? We&#8217;ve had cameras in space for decades that can see much smaller objects than the pyramids. My house isn&#8217;t the size of the pyramids, but it&#8217;s clearly visible on satellite photos. So is it visible from space? I doubt even the sharpest pair of eyes could make it out from space, even for low definitions of &#8220;space&#8221;. </p>
<p>And how about defining &#8220;man made object&#8221;? Is the Panama Canal a man made object? I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s visible from space (for most definitions of &#8220;visible&#8221; and &#8220;space&#8221;). I think most would agree that the Hoover Dam is a man made object, but what of Lake Mead? Is a lake created by man a &#8220;man made object&#8221;? Hmmm, I think it&#8217;s probably not an &#8220;object&#8221;, but I&#8217;m sure there are those that might disagree (on the Internet, someone will always disagree). Pick any of thousands of malls or airports, all of which are larger than the pyramids. </p>
<p>Basically, the whole question is ill-defined.  But for further analysis, see the &#8220;Visibilty from space&#8221; section of the Wikipedia article on the Great Wall of China at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Wall_of_China#Visibility_from_space" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Wall_of_China#Visibility_from_space</a> . Based on that (with the usual caveats about trusting what one reads on Wikipedia), the Great Wall is just barely, maybe, almost visible from LEO. If you know exactly where to look. And if the weather is really good and the light is right. And if you have good eyes. And maybe a good imagination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mooeypoo</title>
		<link>http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/man-made-structures-seen-from-space/comment-page-1/#comment-25317</link>
		<dc:creator>mooeypoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smarterthanthat.com/?p=801#comment-25317</guid>
		<description>Right, and astronauts are considered officially astronauts when they passed 50km above the surface of the Earth. You can see quite more than just the pyramids from both these heights (50km and 100km).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, and astronauts are considered officially astronauts when they passed 50km above the surface of the Earth. You can see quite more than just the pyramids from both these heights (50km and 100km).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nowoo</title>
		<link>http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/man-made-structures-seen-from-space/comment-page-1/#comment-25272</link>
		<dc:creator>nowoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smarterthanthat.com/?p=801#comment-25272</guid>
		<description>One definition of the edge of space is the Kármán line, at an altitude of 100km:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A1rm%C3%A1n_line</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One definition of the edge of space is the Kármán line, at an altitude of 100km:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A1rm%C3%A1n_line" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A1rm%C3%A1n_line</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
